Evidence-Based Policy for Digital Health Adoption in Africa

1. Introduction: The Imperative for Evidence-Based Digital Health in Africa

The landscape of global healthcare is undergoing a profound transformation, driven by the rapid advancements in digital technologies. This shift is particularly pertinent in Africa, a continent grappling with unique healthcare challenges such as limited access to care, inadequate human resources, and the dual burden of communicable and non-communicable diseases.1 Against this backdrop, the concept of evidence-based policy (EBP) emerges as a critical framework for guiding the strategic integration of digital health solutions. EBP ensures that policy decisions are not merely reactive or based on intuition, but are instead grounded in rigorous, objective evidence, thereby maximizing impact and optimizing resource allocation.

1.1. Defining Evidence-Based Policy (EBP) and its Application in Public Health

Evidence-based policy, also referred to as evidence-informed policy or evidence-based governance, advocates for public policy decisions to be influenced by or directly based on rigorously established objective evidence.2 This approach stands in stark contrast to policymaking driven by ideology, anecdotal observations, or personal convictions.2 The methodology underpinning EBP often incorporates comprehensive research methods, with a strong preference for experimental designs such as randomized controlled trials (RCTs).2 For a policy to genuinely claim to be evidence-based, it must meet specific criteria: comparative evidence must exist regarding its effects versus at least one alternative, and this evidence must support the chosen policy in alignment with stated preferences in the relevant policy area.2

The intellectual lineage of EBP traces back to Evidence-Based Medicine (EBM), a paradigm that emphasizes the use of high-quality evidence and stringent methodological standards in clinical practice.3 In the realm of public health, this model is adapted into Evidence-Based Public Health (EBPH). EBPH extends the individual-focused EBM model by explicitly integrating variables that address the contextual factors of the population or community, recognizing that public health interventions operate within complex social, economic, and political environments.4

In diverse contexts such as those found across Africa, the definition of "high-quality evidence" requires a flexible and inclusive interpretation. While EBP often prioritizes RCTs as the gold standard, it is recognized that not all policy-relevant areas are best served by quantitative research alone.2 Policies concerning human rights, public acceptability, or social justice, for example, may necessitate different forms of evidence.2 For digital health adoption in Africa, where healthcare systems are highly varied, resource-constrained, and influenced by unique socio-cultural dynamics, a rigid adherence to solely quantitative experimental evidence may be impractical or insufficient. This means that data elucidating contextual conditions—such as population characteristics, interpersonal variables, organizational factors, social norms, and political and economic realities—becomes critically important for policy formulation.4 Therefore, policies should be informed by a broader evidence base that accounts for local realities, feasibility, and equity, ensuring that interventions are not only effective but also adaptable and acceptable.

1.2. Overview of Digital Health and its Transformative Potential

Digital health represents an evolving field that harnesses digital technologies to enhance healthcare delivery and management.5 Its broad scope includes mobile health (mHealth), telehealth, wearable devices, telemedicine, health information technologies, and personalized medicines.5 At its core, digital health seeks to improve health outcomes by making healthcare more accessible, personalized, and efficient.6

This technological integration offers compelling solutions to fundamental healthcare challenges, particularly the dual objectives of increasing healthcare availability while simultaneously reducing costs.7 This is especially vital for regions like Africa, which often face a scarcity of medical professionals and significant geographical barriers to care.7 Digital health tools facilitate real-time monitoring of health, enable remote consultations, and streamline health management, thereby revolutionizing patient care and overall healthcare systems.6

The potential of digital health extends beyond mere technological enhancement; it serves as a powerful catalyst for systemic health reform. It is not simply an add-on but a fundamental lever for transforming healthcare.1 For instance, evidence suggests that digital investments, when guided by robust data, can help governments achieve substantial cost savings—up to 15% of health system costs globally.5 This indicates a profound systemic impact, allowing for the redirection of saved resources into other critical areas of healthcare.1 Policymakers in Africa should therefore view digital health not merely as a technological upgrade, but as a strategic tool for driving comprehensive health system strengthening, encompassing improvements in efficiency, access, quality, and equity, rather than focusing solely on isolated technological interventions.

1.3. Purpose and Scope of the White Paper, Emphasizing the African Context

This white paper aims to meticulously analyze the intersection of evidence-based policy and digital health within the unique and diverse African context. It will identify specific challenges that impede digital health adoption while highlighting significant opportunities for its effective integration. The ultimate goal is to provide a strategic roadmap for policymakers, healthcare providers, technology developers, and other stakeholders. This roadmap is designed to foster the adoption of digital health solutions in a manner that is both effective and equitable across the African continent. The emphasis throughout will be on leveraging evidence to inform policy, ensuring that digital health initiatives are impactful, sustainable, and meticulously tailored to the distinct realities and needs of African populations.

2. Foundations of Evidence-Based Policy for Health

The principles of Evidence-Based Policy (EBP) provide a robust framework for ensuring that public health interventions are effective, efficient, and equitable. This section delves into these core principles, the types of evidence considered, and the inherent challenges in applying EBP, particularly in complex public health settings.

2.1. Core Principles and Methodologies of EBP

At the heart of EBP is the reliance on high-quality evidence.3 This principle dictates that policy decisions must be informed by credible, systematically gathered, and analyzed data, moving beyond mere speculation, intuition, or anecdotal observations.3 The primary objective of EBP is to

focus on "what works".3 This involves answering empirical questions about the measurable impact of policy interventions, such as whether a specific public health campaign effectively reduces disease incidence or which intervention is most cost-effective in improving community health indicators.3

EBP insists on rigorous methodological standards for evidence production, with a strong preference for experimental evidence.3 The

preference for Randomized Controlled Trials (RCTs) is a cornerstone, as RCTs are widely considered the "gold standard" for determining causal effects.3 They mitigate bias by randomly allocating units (e.g., individuals, communities) to either a treatment group (receiving the intervention) or a control group (not receiving it or receiving an alternative).3 This randomization helps to balance confounding factors between groups, providing unbiased estimates of average treatment effects (ATEs) and requiring fewer substantive assumptions compared to other study designs.3

To organize and evaluate the quality of evidence, EBP often employs evidence hierarchies.3 RCTs and meta-analyses of RCTs typically rank highest due to their experimental control, which is believed to offer the most reliable insights into policy effects.3 Quasi-experimental and observational studies (e.g., matching methods, multivariate regression) are generally ranked lower due to a higher risk of bias from a lack of experimental control. Qualitative studies, case-control studies, and expert judgment are often placed at the bottom of these hierarchies when evaluating policy effectiveness, though their value in other aspects of policy understanding is acknowledged.3

The process also involves evidence synthesis and dissemination.3 Results from high-quality studies are often amalgamated in meta-analyses to compute an overall best estimate of a policy effect. They are also collated in systematic reviews and other evidence syntheses that summarize the available evidence base and grade it by quality.3 Institutions such as the Campbell and Cochrane Collaborations play a crucial role in facilitating this synthesis and dissemination.3 Ultimately, the insistence on credible evidence in EBP aims to

promote objectivity, transparency, and accountability in policymaking by reducing the influence of individual values and political expediency.3

2.2. Types of Evidence Relevant to Public Health Policy

Research studies generate various types of data that are relevant to public health policy. Brownson et al. categorize these into three distinct types 4:

• Type I data serves to elucidate the causes, magnitude, severity, and preventability of diseases. Examples include findings from needs assessments, prevalence and incidence rates of morbidity and mortality, and insights into known program or service failures.4 This type of data helps to define the scope of a public health problem.

• Type II data demonstrates the relative impact of specific interventions, categorizing them as evidence-based, efficacious, promising, or emerging.4 This data is crucial for understanding the effectiveness of different approaches to a health challenge.

• Type III data provides the contextual conditions surrounding interventions. This includes factors such as the characteristics of the targeted population, interpersonal variables, organizational variables, prevailing social norms, and broader political and economic factors.4 This data is vital for understanding
  how and why an intervention works (or doesn't) in a particular setting.

For public health research to be truly useful, it should be duplicable, practical, and feasible.4 It should also systematically assess a program or policy's health and economic impacts, identify potential risks from inaction, analyze effects on inequities and vulnerable populations, and provide implications for resolving public health dilemmas.4

2.3. Challenges in Applying EBP, Including Extrapolation and Practical Feasibility

Despite its merits, applying EBP, particularly in the complex domain of public health, presents several challenges. A significant hurdle is extrapolation, which refers to the difficulty of using evidence from a specific study population to inform policy decisions for different target populations.3 Contexts, demographics, existing health infrastructure, and socio-cultural dynamics vary widely, making direct transferability of findings problematic.3

Another challenge is value-entanglement.3 The inherent methodological tenets of EBP, especially the strong emphasis on RCTs, might inadvertently privilege certain types of policy questions (e.g., micro-level interventions) over others (e.g., large-scale health system reforms). This can also favor average outcomes over distributive impacts, potentially influencing which public health values are prioritized in decision-making.3

Practical feasibility is a substantial barrier. Implementing large-scale RCTs for complex public health interventions or national policies can be difficult or even impossible due to ethical considerations, prohibitive costs, and immense logistical complexities.3 Furthermore, public health agencies often face

barriers to EBPH adoption such as limited time and funding, shortages of appropriately trained staff, and a general lack of knowledge about EBPH among practitioners.4 Access to scientific information, an inadequate understanding of what constitutes evidence, limited skills in using electronic resources, and the cost associated with accessing such resources further compound these challenges.4

The translation of research into practice also presents difficulties.4 Real-world practice environments are often far more complex than controlled research settings. Implementers may not have been involved in the research validating a practice and may therefore lack a full understanding of its nuances. Implementation processes are influenced by various factors, including individual adopter characteristics, organizational context, and the changes required by the new practice.4 Additional challenges include external validity, defining evidence given differences between academic and community standards, language barriers between partners, the non-sustainability of collaborative relationships (often due to funding), and a fundamental lack of trust.4

The African context amplifies many of these challenges, demanding a pragmatic, hybrid approach to evidence. The ideal reliance on RCTs, while valuable, is often constrained by the practical realities of resource limitations, ethical considerations in public health settings, and the sheer diversity of African healthcare systems.3 This underscores the critical importance of Type III data, which focuses on contextual factors.4 This data is essential for understanding

why interventions succeed or fail in specific African settings and for ensuring their transferability across different contexts.4 Therefore, policymakers should advocate for a diversified evidence portfolio that includes not only Type I and II data but also robust Type III data, qualitative studies, and implementation research. This hybrid approach will ensure that digital health policies are not only effective but also adaptable, acceptable, and sustainable within Africa's diverse and dynamic healthcare landscape.

Furthermore, the barriers related to workforce training and the challenges in translating research into practice highlight a significant gap between the availability of evidence and its practical application.4 The World Health Organization's (WHO) emphasis on training and education for healthcare professionals directly addresses this issue.9 Consequently, effective digital health policy in Africa must include explicit strategies for capacity building in EBPH principles, research appraisal, and implementation science among healthcare professionals and policymakers. This includes fostering partnerships between academia and public health agencies 4 to ensure that evidence is not only produced but also understood, adapted, and utilized effectively at the local level, thereby bridging the "knowing-doing gap" in African public health.

3. The Digital Health Landscape in Africa: Trends, Components, and Growth

Digital health is rapidly reshaping healthcare delivery globally, and Africa is increasingly becoming a significant part of this transformation. This section outlines the key components of digital health, global and regional adoption trends, and the specific drivers fueling its growth across the African continent.

3.1. Key Components of Digital Health

Digital health encompasses a wide array of tools and technologies designed to improve patient care, health management, and overall healthcare systems.6 These components include:

• Mobile Health (mHealth): This involves the use of mobile devices, such as smartphones and tablets, for health services. Applications range from disseminating health information and targeted patient communications to providing support for health interventions.5 The WHO specifically recommends mobile devices for critical functions like birth, death, and stock notifications, commodity management, telemedicine, health worker decision support, and digital tracking of health status and services in various contexts.9

• Telehealth/Telemedicine: These terms refer to the remote provision of healthcare services through technology. This includes virtual consultations, remote patient monitoring, and the delivery of diagnostic services from a distance.5

• Wearable Devices & At-Home Monitoring: This category includes smartwatches, fitness bands, and a variety of medical devices like body and temperature monitors, sleep trackers, glucose monitors, blood pressure monitors, and cardiac monitors. These devices are used by individuals to track their health and fitness in real-time, enabling personalized health management.5

• Electronic Health Records (EHRs)/Digital Health Systems: These are digital versions of patients' medical charts, often cloud-based, which facilitate secure data storage, improve accessibility for healthcare professionals, and enhance collaboration among care teams.6

• Artificial Intelligence (AI) & Machine Learning (ML): The integration of AI and ML technologies is transforming healthcare by enabling more accurate diagnostics, supporting the development of new treatments, facilitating personalized medicine, and efficiently processing vast amounts of health data.5

• Healthcare Analytics: These tools are designed to analyze large datasets of health information to derive actionable insights, identify trends, and inform decision-making at both clinical and policy levels.5

Table 1 provides a structured overview of these key components and their diverse applications within the digital health ecosystem.

Table 1: Key Components of Digital Health and Their Applications

3.2. Global and Regional Adoption Trends and Market Projections

The global digital health market is experiencing robust and sustained growth. Projections indicate an increase from USD 427.24 billion in 2025 to USD 1,500.69 billion by 2032, demonstrating a Compound Annual Growth Rate (CAGR) of 19.7%.5 Another estimate places the market at USD 305.17 billion in 2024, with a projected surge to USD 1,812.36 billion by 2034 at a CAGR of 19.5%.6 North America currently holds the largest share of this market, accounting for 42.81% in 2024.5

Africa, specifically the LAMEA (Latin America, Middle East, and Africa) region, is also witnessing significant expansion in its digital health market. Valued at USD 23.19 billion in 2024, this market is predicted to surpass USD 137.74 billion by 2034.6 The COVID-19 pandemic significantly accelerated global adoption, driven by an increased demand for teleconsultations and mHealth solutions.5 This period saw a notable rise in the use of remote monitoring devices by physicians, increasing from 12% in 2016 to 30% in 2022.5 Furthermore, the digital health app ecosystem has exploded, with over 90,000 new applications introduced globally in 2020 alone.5

3.3. Drivers of Digital Health Growth in Africa

Several factors are fueling the substantial growth of digital health across Africa:

• Smartphone Penetration and Mobile Technology: Sub-Saharan Africa has undergone a remarkable digital transformation primarily driven by the widespread adoption of mobile technology. Over 80% of the population now has a mobile phone subscription, with smartphone adoption projected to reach 88% by 2030.1 This phenomenon, often referred to as "leapfrogging," has enabled the continent to bypass the traditional development of landline infrastructure and transition directly into the digital age.1 This unique advantage means that digital health strategies in Africa should prioritize mobile-first solutions and mHealth applications. The widespread mobile penetration allows for potentially faster and more cost-effective innovation and scaling of digital health solutions compared to regions burdened by legacy systems. Policies should therefore explicitly support mobile-centric innovation and infrastructure development that leverages this existing widespread access.

• Increasing Demand for Accessible Care: Patients are increasingly seeking more convenient and accessible ways to interact with healthcare providers, which in turn drives the adoption of telemedicine and virtual consultations.6 Digital tools are particularly effective in improving access to essential health services, especially for hard-to-reach populations who may live hours away from healthcare facilities.8

• Government Initiatives and Global Support: Governments worldwide, alongside influential global organizations like the WHO, are actively promoting digital health tools for disease management. Initiatives such as the Global Initiative on Digital Health (GIDH) facilitate the sharing of knowledge and digital products.5 The WHO Global Strategy on Digital Health 2020-2024 explicitly aims to accelerate the appropriate adoption of digital health globally.7

• Rising Research and Development (R&D) and Start-up Ecosystem: There is a growing focus on R&D among digital health companies, and a surge in health-tech startups globally, attracting increasing investments.5 HolonIQ's "Sub Saharan Africa Digital Health 50" highlights a vibrant landscape of promising startups in the region.11 Health technology is notably ranked as one of the top five digital business sectors in sub-Saharan Africa, indicating significant local entrepreneurial activity.1 The existence of this vibrant, albeit nascent, local innovation ecosystem demonstrates that growth drivers are not solely external but are also internal, propelled by local entrepreneurs addressing specific local challenges. Policy frameworks must therefore move beyond merely adopting external technologies to actively fostering and nurturing this local digital health innovation. This includes creating supportive regulatory sandboxes, facilitating access to funding for startups, promoting public-private partnerships 10, and investing in local talent development to ensure that solutions are culturally relevant, contextually appropriate, and sustainable.

• Demand for Cost-Efficiency: Digital health technologies offer a transformative pathway to revolutionize healthcare delivery while simultaneously reducing costs and improving access.6 Evidence-based digital investments have the potential to save up to 15% of health system costs.5

• Advancements in Telecommunication: Ongoing advancements in telecommunication, including the Internet of Things (IoT), 5G networks, and improved network infrastructure, are creating numerous opportunities for market growth by enabling faster networks and more accessible applications.5

Table 2 provides a summary of the market projections and key growth drivers for digital health, highlighting the significant potential within the African context.

Table 2: Digital Health Market Projections and Growth Drivers (Global and African Context)

4. Challenges to Digital Health Adoption in Africa

Despite the immense potential of digital health in Africa, several significant barriers impede its widespread and equitable adoption. Addressing these challenges is crucial for realizing the transformative benefits of digital health across the continent.

4.1. Infrastructure and Connectivity Limitations

One of the most fundamental barriers to digital health adoption in Sub-Saharan Africa is the pervasive issue of inadequate infrastructure and connectivity.10 Many rural areas, in particular, suffer from a lack of reliable electricity and consistent internet access, which directly hinders the effective implementation and sustained operation of digital health solutions.10 Data indicates that nearly 280 million people in Sub-Saharan Africa remain offline, severely limiting their access to digital health resources.10 While mobile phone subscriptions are remarkably high, exceeding 80% of the population, and smartphone adoption is projected to reach 88% by 2030, overall internet use remains comparatively low (22% in 2021, with mobile internet penetration at 25% in 2023).1 This disparity creates a "digital divide" even within the mobile-first landscape. Policies that assume universal internet access risk exacerbating existing health inequities. Therefore, digital health policy in Africa must explicitly address this internal digital divide. Strategies should focus on expanding affordable internet access, particularly in rural areas, and developing digital health solutions that are optimized for low-bandwidth environments, offline capabilities, and feature phones, ensuring inclusivity and equitable access for all citizens, not just those with high-end smartphone and internet access.

4.2. Fragmented Regulatory Environments and Policy Gaps

The regulatory landscape for digital health technologies in Sub-Saharan Africa is often characterized by fragmentation and inconsistency.10 A significant number of countries lack comprehensive national policies specifically designed to support digital health initiatives; as of 2020, only 27% of African countries had established such policies.10 The World Health Organization (WHO) has underscored the critical need for clear regulatory frameworks to ensure the safety and efficacy of digital health solutions.10 This regulatory vacuum contributes to challenges such as a lack of standardization and difficulties in integrating diverse digital health solutions across different health systems.5 Without harmonized and robust regulatory guidelines, ensuring patient safety, data integrity, and the interoperability necessary for scalable digital health ecosystems becomes exceedingly difficult.

4.3. Healthcare Workforce Capacity and Digital Literacy

A substantial challenge lies in the healthcare workforce itself. There is a significant shortage of trained healthcare professionals in Sub-Saharan Africa who possess the necessary skills to effectively utilize digital tools.10 A survey conducted by the African Development Bank revealed that over 50% of healthcare workers in the region lack adequate training in digital health.10 This deficit extends beyond technical skills to include a general skepticism among healthcare workers regarding the adequacy of training and support for using digital health technologies. Concerns about increased workload and the seamless integration of digital health solutions into existing clinical workflows can also deter their adoption.10 Furthermore, digital literacy limitations among the general population present an additional barrier, affecting patient engagement and the effective use of digital health resources.12

4.4. Data Privacy, Security Concerns, and User Skepticism

The increasing adoption of digital health solutions globally has brought to the forefront significant privacy issues, particularly concerning the vast amounts of health data being generated and stored in diverse formats across various health information systems.5 Healthcare data breaches are a serious global concern, with millions of patient records affected annually in some regions.5 These concerns regarding data privacy and security directly influence the choice of digital technologies and the design and conduct of studies for these technologies.9 It is imperative that digital tools adhere to stringent international standards for data protection, such as the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996 (HIPAA), the EU General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR), and ISO 270001.9

Beyond technical security, user skepticism and concerns about data privacy, the reliability of digital platforms, and the perceived quality of care delivered through digital channels persist.10 Many users harbor fears that remote consultations may not provide the same level of care as in-person visits.10 This points to a deeper issue of public trust in digital systems and the institutions managing them. The African Union (AU) Data Policy Framework acknowledges that while regulatory tools can strengthen cybersecurity, their misuse could undermine fundamental rights such as equity, dignity, and security.13 Without trust, even the most technologically advanced solutions will face low adoption rates. Therefore, policy efforts must prioritize building public trust in digital health. This extends beyond technical security measures to include transparent data governance frameworks, clear communication about data use and patient rights, robust accountability mechanisms for data breaches, and a demonstrated commitment to patient-centric care. Engaging communities and directly addressing their concerns will be critical for fostering widespread acceptance and adoption.

5. Opportunities and Impact: Evidence from African Digital Health Initiatives

Despite the challenges, Africa presents a fertile ground for digital health innovation and adoption, with numerous opportunities to leverage technology for profound healthcare transformation. Evidence from existing initiatives highlights the tangible benefits and significant potential for impact.

5.1. Leveraging Mobile Technology for "Leapfrogging" Traditional Healthcare Challenges

The rapid and widespread adoption of mobile technology across Sub-Saharan Africa has created a unique opportunity for the continent to bypass the traditional, often costly and time-consuming, development of fixed-line infrastructure.1 This "leapfrogging" phenomenon allows African nations to move directly into the digital age, utilizing mobile phones as a primary tool for delivering healthcare services remotely and efficiently.1 This is particularly advantageous in regions with limited physical healthcare infrastructure and a scarcity of healthcare professionals, enabling the dissemination of vital health information and the provision of support for various health interventions directly to communities.8 This inherent mobile-first advantage positions Africa to innovate and scale digital health solutions faster and more cost-effectively than regions that had to transition from legacy systems.

5.2. Case Studies and Successful mHealth Programs

Several African countries have demonstrated remarkable progress in integrating digital health solutions, providing compelling evidence of their effectiveness:

• South Africa exhibits one of the highest digital health adoption rates on the continent, with a strong focus on specialist teleconsultations, chronic disease management, and mental health services.12

• Kenya has shown robust mHealth integration and the development of advanced mobile applications, particularly in critical areas such as maternal health, HIV care, and sexual and reproductive health.10

• Nigeria, despite facing ongoing infrastructural and regulatory constraints, is making strides in advancing innovations for remote diagnosis and teleconsultation.12

Beyond these national examples, numerous studies across Africa have documented the successful use of mHealth technologies, such as short message service (SMS) interventions, to improve health outcomes.1 The COVID-19 pandemic further showcased the continent's adaptability, with telemedicine centers being rapidly integrated and scaled in resource-constrained environments to manage cases.1 These examples provide concrete demonstrations of digital health's capacity to deliver tangible benefits in diverse African settings.

5.3. Quantifiable Efficiency Gains and Cost Savings Potential

One of the most compelling arguments for accelerating digital health adoption in Africa is its potential for significant economic benefits. Digital health tools are projected to lead to substantial efficiency gains within African health systems, potentially reducing total healthcare expenditures by up to 15% by 2030.5 These savings are not merely theoretical; they translate into significant monetary values for specific countries:

• Kenya could realize estimated savings ranging from $400 million to $2.5 billion, representing 4–14% of its projected healthcare spending.1

• Nigeria stands to save between $700 million and $3.3 billion, equivalent to 4–10% of its projected healthcare spending.1

• South Africa could see the most substantial savings, ranging from $1.9 billion to $11 billion, accounting for 6–15% of its projected healthcare spending.1

These significant savings are primarily driven by shifts towards virtual interactions and the digitization of records, reducing reliance on paper-based systems.8 Critically, these efficiency gains are not simply about cutting costs; they represent a strategic financial opportunity. The saved capital could be redirected to other critical, often underfunded, areas of the health system, such as fair compensation for healthcare workers, improving access to essential services, and enhancing overall health outcomes.1 This reframes digital health investments from mere expenditures to strategic financial decisions that unlock capital for broader health system strengthening and sustainability.

Beyond direct cost savings, digital tools can also significantly improve patient compliance with treatment plans, leading to better health outcomes and reducing the burden of disease.8 Furthermore, the availability of high-quality health data, especially when combined with advanced analytics powered by Artificial Intelligence (AI) and Machine Learning (ML), can lead to more informed clinical decisions, individualized patient care, and improved overall population health.14 The current lack of adequate and high-quality health data in Africa has historically impeded understanding of health-related issues and hindered effective policy formulation and evaluation.14 Therefore, beyond deploying digital tools, policies must prioritize robust health data governance, collection, standardization, and interoperability. Investing in data infrastructure and data science capabilities is paramount. This will enable Africa to fully leverage AI/ML for predictive analytics, personalized medicine, and real-time policy adjustments, moving beyond basic service delivery to truly transformative, data-driven healthcare.

Table 3 provides a clear summary of the potential efficiency gains from digital health adoption in key African countries.

Table 3: Potential Efficiency Gains from Digital Health Adoption in Key African Countries (by 2030)

6. Policy and Governance Frameworks for Digital Health in Africa

Effective digital health adoption in Africa hinges on the establishment of robust, harmonized, and forward-looking policy and governance frameworks. International and regional bodies are providing critical guidance, while national efforts and multi-stakeholder collaborations are essential for successful implementation.

6.1. WHO Global Strategy on Digital Health and its Guiding Principles

The World Health Organization (WHO) has articulated a clear vision for the future of digital health through its Global Strategy on Digital Health 2020-2024, often referred to simply as "The Strategy." Its overarching aim is to "improve health for everyone, everywhere by accelerating the adoption of appropriate digital health".7 This strategy is built upon three core guiding principles:

1. Advocating for a unified strategy for digital health initiatives globally.7

2. Acknowledging that the adoption process of digital health is ultimately a decision to be made by each individual country, respecting national sovereignty and context.7

3. Promoting the appropriate use of digital technologies in healthcare, ensuring they are applied effectively, ethically, and equitably.7

The Strategy outlines four strategic objectives: committing to a shared global agenda by engaging diverse stakeholders; building global digital health capacity tailored to the specific needs of individual nations; advancing digital health in every country; and continuously improving digital health measurement, monitoring, research, and practice.7 To achieve these objectives, a four-part framework for action is established: committing to the plan through roadmaps and stakeholder engagement; catalyzing the plan by identifying country needs and providing guidance; measuring results using Key Performance Indicators (KPIs); and incrementally iterating and improving through ongoing assessment and refinement.7 The WHO emphasizes patient-centricity, empowering patients through informed healthcare choices, and leveraging advanced technologies like AI and Machine Learning for sophisticated data management.7 Furthermore, WHO recommendations for digital health specifically include the use of mobile devices for various health functions and the importance of training and education for healthcare professionals.9

6.2. African Union Data Policy Framework and its Implications for Health Data Governance

Complementing global efforts, the African Union (AU) released its Data Policy Framework in 2022. This comprehensive document serves as a multi-year blueprint for Africa's digital economy, outlining the AU's vision, scope, and priorities for the continent's data ecosystem.13 The Framework aims to guide Member States in navigating complex regulatory issues and to facilitate the creation of an African Digital Single Market (DSM).13 Its guiding principles range from data sovereignty to fairness and inclusiveness.13

The Framework highlights five key areas of focus: establishing foundational infrastructure and trustworthy systems; developing institutional arrangements for complex regulation; rebalancing the legal system; creating public value from data; and promoting coherent sectoral policies.13 Crucially, the AU Data Policy Framework explicitly recognizes health data as a unique category that demands more rigorous protections and robust governance instruments, recommending the development of sector-specific data governance frameworks.15 Specific recommendations include the creation of independent, adequately funded, and effective data protection authorities (DPAs), and the requirement for data protection risk assessments (DPIAs) when deploying new technologies.13

The AU Framework's emphasis on health data governance is critical for the scalability of digital health solutions. Without harmonized, robust, and trusted data governance, the ability to scale digital health solutions across borders and within national health systems will be severely limited, hindering the realization of efficiency gains and improved outcomes. Therefore, African nations must prioritize the rapid development and implementation of national health data governance frameworks that align with the AU's principles and international best practices (e.g., GDPR, ISO 270001). This includes establishing independent data protection authorities, mandating data protection impact assessments for digital health technologies, and fostering interoperability standards to ensure secure and ethical data exchange, which is foundational for a truly integrated digital health ecosystem.

6.3. The Role of National Policies and Public-Private Partnerships

While global and regional frameworks provide overarching guidance, national policies are paramount for successful digital health adoption, as the WHO acknowledges that adoption is ultimately a country's decision.7 However, a significant gap exists, with only 27% of African countries having established national policies supporting digital health initiatives as of 2020.10 This highlights an urgent need for policymakers to collaborate actively with all stakeholders—including healthcare providers, technology developers, and patients—to develop comprehensive, context-specific guidelines that foster innovation while rigorously protecting patient rights and privacy.10

Public-private partnerships (PPPs) represent a vital mechanism for accelerating digital health advancements in Sub-Saharan Africa. By strategically leveraging the distinct strengths of both the public and private sectors, PPPs can drive innovation, enhance service delivery, and significantly improve health outcomes.10 The AU Framework also champions PPPs, particularly for deploying essential broadband infrastructure and creating trustworthy digital identity systems, recognizing their role in spurring entrepreneurship and public data reuse.13 These partnerships can bridge funding gaps, bring in technological expertise, and facilitate the scaling of solutions that might otherwise be out of reach for public sector initiatives alone.

The WHO Strategy's emphasis on "identifying countries willing to serve as 'digital health champions'" 7 acknowledges that broad strategies require concrete, localized implementation models. The uneven adoption rates and policy gaps across African countries 10 indicate that a "one-size-fits-all" approach is insufficient. Policy efforts should therefore focus on identifying and empowering national and sub-national "digital health champions" who can pilot, evaluate, and scale evidence-based digital health interventions. These champions can serve as learning hubs, demonstrating best practices, adapting global guidelines to local contexts, and providing peer-to-peer learning opportunities across the continent, thereby accelerating practical adoption and policy refinement.

7. Recommendations for Strengthening Evidence-Based Digital Health Policy in Africa

To fully harness the transformative potential of digital health in Africa, a multi-faceted and integrated policy approach is essential. The following recommendations, grounded in the principles of evidence-based policy and tailored to the African context, aim to accelerate effective and equitable digital health adoption.

7.1. Strategic Investments in Digital Infrastructure and Connectivity

Recommendation: Prioritize and significantly increase targeted investments in expanding broadband infrastructure, mobile network coverage, and ensuring reliable electricity access, particularly in rural and underserved areas.10 This includes exploring innovative, sustainable energy solutions for remote health facilities.

Rationale: Inadequate infrastructure and connectivity remain the most fundamental barriers to widespread digital health adoption and equitable access across Africa.10 Addressing this foundational challenge is paramount. This aligns directly with the AU Data Policy Framework's focus on developing foundational infrastructure as the backbone of the data-driven economy.13 Without reliable connectivity, even the most advanced digital health solutions cannot reach the populations most in need.

7.2. Developing Harmonized and Adaptive Regulatory Frameworks

Recommendation: Policymakers must actively collaborate with all relevant stakeholders, including healthcare providers, technology developers, and patient advocacy groups, to develop comprehensive, clear, and consistent national and regional regulatory frameworks for digital health. These frameworks should foster innovation while rigorously protecting patient rights and privacy.10 This process should align with the principles and recommendations of the AU Data Policy Framework, particularly its call for sector-specific health data governance.13

Rationale: Fragmented and inconsistent regulations severely hinder innovation, cross-border scalability, and the development of a cohesive digital health market.10 Harmonized and adaptive regulations are crucial for ensuring the safety, efficacy, and trustworthiness of digital health solutions, thereby promoting widespread adoption and investment.10

7.3. Capacity Building and Training for Healthcare Professionals and the Public

Recommendation: Implement robust and continuous training programs for healthcare workers across all levels, focusing on digital literacy, the effective and ethical use of digital health technologies, and data management.4 These programs should address the current shortage of skilled professionals and incorporate practical, context-specific training. Simultaneously, launch public digital literacy campaigns to enhance user confidence, address skepticism, and empower citizens to effectively utilize digital health resources.10

Rationale: A skilled healthcare workforce and a digitally literate population are indispensable for the successful adoption and sustained utilization of digital health tools. This directly addresses skepticism about the quality of digital care and improves patient engagement, ultimately enhancing the overall quality and reach of healthcare services.10 This also directly tackles the "knowledge, attitude, and behaviors" gaps identified by WHO.9

7.4. Robust Data Governance, Privacy, and Security Protocols

Recommendation: Establish and empower independent and adequately resourced Data Protection Authorities (DPAs) within each nation. Mandate comprehensive Data Protection Impact Assessments (DPIAs) for all new digital health technologies before deployment.13 Ensure that national data protection policies comply with international standards such as HIPAA, GDPR, and ISO 270001, while also being adapted to specific local contexts and cultural sensitivities.9 Prioritize interoperability standards to facilitate secure and ethical data exchange across different systems.

Rationale: Addressing privacy concerns and ensuring robust data security are paramount for building public trust and fostering widespread adoption of digital health solutions. Ethical handling of sensitive health data is crucial for leveraging advanced capabilities like AI and Machine Learning.5 Effective policies in this area can shift perceptions and behaviors by demonstrating a commitment to safety, efficacy, and user experience.

7.5. Fostering Local Innovation and Research in Digital Health

Recommendation: Create supportive ecosystems for local digital health startups and innovators through dedicated funding mechanisms (e.g., venture capital, grants), incubators, accelerators, and regulatory sandboxes.1 Promote and fund research into context-specific digital health solutions, emphasizing the collection and use of Type III data to understand and address unique contextual factors and implementation challenges.4

Rationale: Nurturing local innovation ensures that digital health solutions are culturally relevant, contextually appropriate, and directly address the specific healthcare needs and challenges of African populations, leveraging the continent's "leapfrogging" advantage.1 Evidence-based local research is critical for ensuring that these interventions are effective, adaptable, and sustainable, moving beyond mere adoption to true innovation.

7.6. Promoting Inter-Country Collaboration and Knowledge Sharing

Recommendation: Actively participate in and leverage global and regional initiatives such as the WHO's Global Initiative on Digital Health (GIDH) and the African Union's Digital Transformation Strategy.5 Establish formal mechanisms for inter-country collaboration to share best practices, lessons learned, successful digital health assets, and policy frameworks across the continent.

Rationale: Collaboration facilitates policy harmonization, prevents duplication of effort, and accelerates the diffusion of successful digital health models across Africa, fostering a shared global agenda and building collective capacity.7 This approach allows for mutual learning and more rapid progress towards continent-wide digital health transformation.

The various recommendations—spanning infrastructure, regulation, capacity, data governance, innovation, and collaboration—are not isolated. For example, robust data governance enables the full potential of local innovation and ensures that efficiency gains are realized ethically. Capacity building is essential for implementing new regulations and utilizing advanced digital tools. This highlights that success requires simultaneous progress across all these areas, recognizing their profound interdependencies. Policymakers should therefore adopt an integrated, multi-sectoral approach to digital health policy. A "whole-of-government" and "whole-of-society" approach, involving ministries of health, technology, finance, and education, alongside the private sector and civil society, will be necessary to create a truly enabling environment for evidence-based digital health adoption in Africa.

Table 4 summarizes the key challenges and the corresponding proposed policy solutions, serving as a practical guide for strategic action.

Table 4: Challenges and Proposed Policy Solutions for Digital Health Adoption in Africa

8. Conclusion: Paving the Way for a Healthier Digital Future in Africa

The integration of digital health solutions, guided by robust evidence-based policy, offers an unparalleled opportunity to fundamentally transform healthcare across the African continent. This white paper has underscored the transformative potential of digital health, driven by Africa's unique mobile "leapfrogging" phenomenon and the promise of significant efficiency gains that can be reinvested into critical health system areas. However, realizing this potential requires navigating considerable challenges, particularly concerning inadequate infrastructure, fragmented regulatory environments, insufficient healthcare workforce capacity, and pervasive concerns around data privacy and trust.

The analysis consistently demonstrates the indispensable role of evidence-based approaches. A flexible, context-aware definition of "evidence," one that embraces not only quantitative efficacy data but also qualitative insights into contextual factors and implementation realities, is crucial for designing, implementing, and evaluating effective and equitable digital health policies in Africa. This commitment to evidence ensures accountability, optimizes the allocation of scarce resources, and fosters a culture of continuous improvement and adaptation.

Looking forward, the trajectory for digital health in Africa is one of immense promise. By strategically investing in digital infrastructure, developing harmonized and adaptive regulatory frameworks, building the capacity of both healthcare professionals and the public, establishing robust data governance protocols, fostering local innovation, and promoting inter-country collaboration, Africa can pave the way for a healthier digital future. The continent has a unique opportunity to lead in developing and scaling innovative, context-specific digital health solutions, setting a powerful global example for evidence-based digital transformation in healthcare that prioritizes improved access, enhanced quality, and equitable outcomes for all its citizens.

Works cited

1. Evaluating the digital health technology landscape in sub-Saharan Africa and its implications for cardiovascular health - ResearchGate, accessed on July 1, 2025, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/392568324_Evaluating_the_digital_health_technology_landscape_in_sub-Saharan_Africa_and_its_implications_for_cardiovascular_health

2. Evidence-based policy - Wikipedia, accessed on July 1, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Evidence-based_policy

3. Khosrowi_Routledge Handbook_Evidence Based Policy_chapter, accessed on July 1, 2025, https://philarchive.org/archive/KHOEPR

4. Supporting Research and Evidence-Based Public Health Practice in ..., accessed on July 1, 2025, https://www.apha.org/policy-and-advocacy/public-health-policy-briefs/policy-database/2018/01/18/supporting-research-and-evidence-based-public-health-practice

5. Digital Health Market Size, Trends, Growth, Analysis, 2025-2032, accessed on July 1, 2025, https://www.fortunebusinessinsights.com/industry-reports/digital-health-market-100227

6. Digital Health Market Size to Worth USD 1,812.36 Billion by 2034, accessed on July 1, 2025, https://www.cervicornconsulting.com/digital-health-market

7. The WHO Global Strategy on Digital Health: What You Need to ..., accessed on July 1, 2025, https://evidentiq.com/resources/the-who-global-strategy-on-digital-health-what-you-need-to-know/

8. Digital tools could boost efficiency in African health systems | McKinsey, accessed on July 1, 2025, https://www.mckinsey.com/industries/healthcare/our-insights/how-digital-tools-could-boost-efficiency-in-african-health-systems

9. WHO guidance for digital health: What it means for researchers - PMC, accessed on July 1, 2025, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6952850/

10. Adoption of Digital Health Technologies in Sub-Saharan Africa - Didida, accessed on July 1, 2025, https://didida-health.eu/adoption-of-digital-health-technologies-in-sub-saharan-africa/

11. 2021 Sub Saharan Africa Digital Health 50 - Holon IQ, accessed on July 1, 2025, https://www.holoniq.com/notes/2021-africa-digital-health-50

12. Telemedicine Adoption and Prospects in Sub-Sahara Africa: A Systematic Review with a Focus on South Africa, Kenya, and Nigeria - PubMed Central, accessed on July 1, 2025, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11989057/

13. The African Union's Data Policy Framework: Context, Key Takeaways, and Implications for Data Protection on the Continent - The Future of Privacy Forum, accessed on July 1, 2025, https://fpf.org/blog/the-african-unions-data-policy-framework-context-key-takeaways-and-implications-for-data-protection-on-the-continent/

14. Paucity of Health Data in Africa: An Obstacle to Digital Health Implementation and Evidence-Based Practice - PubMed Central, accessed on July 1, 2025, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10495562/

15. africacdc.org, accessed on July 1, 2025, https://africacdc.org/news-item/stakeholders-gather-to-strengthen-health-data-governance-in-africa/#:~:text=In%20Africa%2C%20the%20AU%20Data,of%20sector%2Dspecific%20data%20governance.