From Community to Commerce: How Participatory Research is Fueling a New Wave of Health Startups in Africa

Abstract

This paper posits that the persistent gap between health research and its practical application in Sub-Saharan Africa can be bridged by leveraging Community-Based Participatory Research (CBPR) as a foundational catalyst for health enterprise development. We argue that CBPR's core principles—equitable partnership, co-learning, and action-orientation—function as a superior form of market validation and a de-risking mechanism for health startups, addressing critical failure points such as lack of product-market fit and community trust. Through an analysis of the Sub-Saharan African health-tech ecosystem, including its unique opportunities and systemic barriers, we propose a novel conceptual framework: the "Community-Driven Venture Pathway." This framework integrates CBPR with principles of participatory design and translational science to guide the transition from community-identified health needs to viable, scalable social enterprises. Case studies from Kenya, South Africa, and Nigeria illustrate the framework's practical application. The paper concludes with targeted policy recommendations for governments, universities, and investors to cultivate an ecosystem that supports this community-first approach to innovation, thereby fostering health ventures that are both commercially sustainable and capable of achieving lasting health equity.

1. Introduction: The Persistent Gap Between Health Research and Community Impact in Sub-Saharan Africa

1.1. The "Valley of Death" in African Health Innovation

In global health, the chasm between promising scientific discovery and its tangible application in community settings represents a critical failure in the innovation pipeline.1 This translational gap, often termed the "valley of death," is where a vast majority of evidence-based interventions languish, never reaching the populations they are designed to serve.2 In Sub-Saharan Africa (SSA), this chasm is particularly pronounced. For decades, the dominant paradigm for health intervention has been a top-down model, where solutions conceived in distant academic centers or by international organizations are implemented in local contexts. While often well-intentioned, this approach is fraught with limitations. Such interventions frequently lack the cultural relevance, community trust, and contextual appropriateness necessary for sustained adoption and impact.4 The result is a landscape littered with pilot projects that demonstrate efficacy in controlled settings but fail to scale, ultimately wasting resources and eroding community trust in both research and healthcare systems.6

This translational failure is not merely a technical or financial problem; it is a fundamental deficit of context and trust. The "valley of death" is filled with the remnants of solutions that were scientifically sound but contextually irrelevant. They were designed for communities, not with them. This persistent gap underscores the urgent need for a paradigm shift—one that moves away from extractive research models and toward a more collaborative, equitable, and community-grounded approach to innovation.

1.2. The Rise of Localized Innovation

Against this backdrop, a powerful counter-narrative is emerging from within the continent itself. Sub-Saharan Africa is fast becoming a hub for disruptive innovation in healthcare, driven by a new generation of local entrepreneurs who are leveraging technology to create solutions tailored to uniquely African challenges.7 This burgeoning health-tech ecosystem is characterized by its ingenuity in addressing systemic barriers. African entrepreneurs possess a unique cultural insight that global firms often miss, allowing them to design and deploy solutions that resonate with local realities.8 From drone-based medical delivery systems in Rwanda and Ghana that circumvent poor road infrastructure to SMS-based telehealth services in Kenya that reach patients without internet access, these innovations are not just copies of Western models; they are contextually intelligent responses to deeply understood local problems.7 This wave of localized innovation signals a pivotal shift, demonstrating that the most effective and sustainable solutions are those that originate from a deep, intrinsic understanding of the community's needs, assets, and environment.

1.3. Central Thesis and Paper Roadmap

This paper argues that Community-Based Participatory Research (CBPR) is not merely an ethical research methodology but a strategic imperative and a powerful catalyst for conceiving, de-risking, and launching successful health startups in Sub-Saharan Africa. By fundamentally reorienting the innovation process to begin with the community, CBPR provides a robust framework for addressing the primary drivers of startup failure: a lack of product-market fit and an absence of user trust. It transforms the research process itself into a form of deep market validation and customer co-creation.

This paper will systematically build this argument. Section 2 will establish the foundational methodologies, defining Health Services Research (HSR) and CBPR and contrasting the latter with traditional research paradigms. Section 3 will provide a comprehensive analysis of the health innovation landscape in SSA, detailing its opportunities, technological trends, and systemic barriers. Section 4 will articulate the core thesis, explaining the catalytic nexus where CBPR principles directly mitigate common startup risks. Section 5 will propose a novel conceptual framework, the "Community-Driven Venture Pathway," to guide the translation of CBPR findings into viable social enterprises. Section 6 will illuminate this pathway with case studies of both formal CBPR projects and successful African health startups analyzed through a CBPR lens. Section 7 will examine the crucial role of the supporting ecosystem, including universities, innovation hubs, and investors. Finally, Section 8 will offer actionable policy recommendations before the conclusion synthesizes the findings and presents a vision for a community-first future of health innovation in Africa.

2. Foundational Methodologies: Situating Community-Based Participatory Research within Health Services Research

2.1. Defining Clinical and Health Services Research (HSR)

Clinical and Health Services Research (HSR) is a multidisciplinary field of inquiry that examines the access to, use, costs, quality, delivery, organization, financing, and outcomes of healthcare services.10 Its primary goal is to produce new knowledge about the structure, processes, and effects of health services for individuals and populations.10 The scope of HSR is exceptionally broad, spanning the perspectives of providers, payers, policymakers, patients, and communities.10 This field is not defined by a single discipline but is rather an amalgam of many, including biostatistics, clinical sciences, economics, epidemiology, sociology, anthropology, ethics, and law.10 HSR addresses critical questions that shape health systems, such as the effectiveness of different health insurance models, the impact of delivery systems like Health Maintenance Organizations (HMOs), and the development of tools for reimbursement and quality assessment.10 It encompasses various types of studies, from behavioral and epidemiological research to clinical trials and public health research, all aimed at improving how healthcare is delivered and experienced.12

2.2. Defining Community-Based Participatory Research (CBPR)

Within the broad domain of HSR, Community-Based Participatory Research (CBPR) represents a distinct orientation and approach. The W.K. Kellogg Foundation's Community Health Scholars Program defines CBPR as "a collaborative approach to research that equitably involves all partners in the research process and recognizes the unique strengths that each brings".13 This definition contains several core tenets. First, CBPR begins with a research topic of importance

to the community, not one solely dictated by academic interests.14 Second, its aim is to combine knowledge generation with tangible action to achieve social change, specifically to improve health outcomes and eliminate health disparities.14 It is fundamentally an approach designed to bridge the gap between science and practice through deep community engagement.16 CBPR is not a specific set of methods but an overall orientation that fundamentally alters the power dynamics between researchers and the community being studied.15

2.3. The Nine Guiding Principles of CBPR

The philosophy of CBPR is operationalized through a set of guiding principles that ensure its collaborative and action-oriented nature. While various sources articulate these slightly differently, a synthesis of the literature reveals nine core tenets 14:

1. Recognizes Community as a Unit of Identity: The community is defined not just by geography but by a shared sense of identity, values, or experience. The research partnership works with and enhances this sense of community.

2. Builds on Community Strengths and Resources: CBPR actively identifies and leverages existing community assets, skills, and social networks, viewing community members as experts in their own right.

3. Facilitates Collaborative, Equitable Partnerships: All partners share control over all phases of the research, from problem definition and data collection to interpretation and dissemination, in a process of shared decision-making.

4. Fosters Co-learning and Capacity Building: The process is bidirectional; researchers learn from community knowledge, and community members build skills in areas like research methods and grant writing.

5. Integrates and Balances Research and Action: The goal is not just to generate knowledge but to apply that knowledge for the mutual benefit of all partners, leading to tangible interventions and community improvements.

6. Addresses Locally Relevant Health Problems: The research agenda is driven by the community's priorities, focusing on health issues that they deem most pressing and attending to the multiple determinants of health (social, economic, environmental).

7. Involves a Cyclical and Iterative Process: CBPR is not a linear project but a continuous cycle of research, reflection, action, and refinement, allowing the partnership and its goals to evolve.

8. Disseminates Findings to All Partners: Results are shared with the community in accessible, understandable formats, and community partners are involved in the wider dissemination to academic and policy audiences.

9. Involves a Long-Term Process and Commitment: True CBPR requires building trust and relationships over time, with a commitment that often extends beyond the lifecycle of a single grant or project.

2.4. CBPR vs. Traditional Research Paradigms

The principles of CBPR represent a radical departure from conventional, investigator-driven research models. The fundamental distinction lies in the distribution of power and the definition of expertise.15 Traditional research often operates

on or in a community, viewing community members as passive subjects or sources of data.20 The researcher holds the power, defines the questions, controls the resources, and is considered the sole expert. In stark contrast, CBPR is conducted

with the community.20 It embraces a "knowledge democracy" that values lived experience equally with academic expertise, replacing the traditional hierarchy with an equitable partnership.21 This shift transforms community members from research subjects into co-creators, partners, and co-owners of the research process and its outcomes.22 The following table provides a clear comparison of these two paradigms.

Table 1: Contrasting Traditional Research with Community-Based Participatory Research (CBPR)

3. The Health Innovation Landscape in Sub-Saharan Africa: A Duality of Unprecedented Opportunity and Systemic Barriers

3.1. Market Dynamics and Growth

The health sector in Sub-Saharan Africa represents a landscape of profound need and immense opportunity. The continent faces a substantial $66 billion annual healthcare financing gap, a challenge that traditional infrastructure expansion alone cannot solve.23 This gap, however, creates a fertile ground for technological innovation to leapfrog conventional models. The African health-tech market is experiencing rapid growth, projected to exceed $11 billion by 2025.24 This potential has attracted significant investment, with the health-tech ecosystem securing a record $550 million between 2020 and 2023.7 In 2023 alone, African health-tech startups raised $167 million across 145 deals, marking a 17% year-over-year growth in a period when overall venture funding on the continent was declining.25 This resilience underscores the perceived value and critical importance of the sector.

3.2. Key Technological Trends and Innovations

African entrepreneurs are harnessing emerging technologies to address the continent's most pressing healthcare challenges, demonstrating a remarkable capacity for context-specific innovation. Several key trends define this landscape:

• Telemedicine and Mobile Health: With a mobile penetration rate of 44% in Sub-Saharan Africa as of 2023, mobile solutions are a powerful tool to overcome the severe shortage of healthcare professionals.7 Startups like Kenya's Zuri Health use SMS-based services to provide telehealth consultations to patients who lack reliable internet access, while Uganda's mTRAC system allows health workers to report on medicine stocks via SMS, improving supply chain visibility in rural areas.7

• Drones and Logistics: Poor road infrastructure and last-mile delivery challenges have historically hampered access to critical medical supplies. Companies like Zipline have revolutionized this space by using autonomous drones to deliver blood, vaccines, and other essential products to remote clinics in Rwanda and Ghana, dramatically reducing delivery times and saving lives.7 This model has been so effective that a study in Ghana linked it to a 56% reduction in maternal deaths in one region.8

• Artificial Intelligence (AI) and Diagnostics: AI is being deployed to augment limited diagnostic capacity. For instance, Ilara Health, founded in Kenya, uses AI-powered devices to bring affordable diagnostics to primary care clinics and has developed technology to detect respiratory illnesses from the sound of a patient's cough.7 In Rwanda, startups are using AI to enable remote analysis of medical images, expanding access to specialized radiology services.26

• Fintech for Health: Addressing the challenge of high out-of-pocket healthcare expenditures, fintech solutions are emerging to improve financial access. Platforms like M-Tiba in Kenya provide a mobile health wallet, while Maisha Meds uses mobile money to offer drug discounts to patients through its pharmacy management software.7

3.3. Systemic Challenges and Barriers to Scale

Despite the dynamism of the innovation ecosystem, startups face formidable systemic barriers that impede their ability to scale and achieve widespread impact.

• Infrastructure Deficits: The lack of reliable electricity in many health facilities, poor road networks, and limited, expensive internet connectivity remain fundamental obstacles.7 These deficits can render digital health solutions unusable and complicate physical supply chains.

• Human Capital Shortages: The continent contends with a critical shortage of trained healthcare workers, with a doctor-to-patient ratio far below WHO recommendations.7 There is also a scarcity of skilled technical talent, such as software engineers and data scientists, which can hinder product development and maintenance.

• Funding Gaps and Volatility: Access to capital, particularly at the early stages, is a primary constraint.27 The African tech ecosystem is heavily reliant on foreign venture capital, with roughly 80% of funding coming from abroad.31 This reliance creates vulnerability, as foreign investors are more likely to retract during global economic downturns, as seen in the post-2022 funding slump.31 The absence of a robust domestic equity financing market makes it difficult for startups to secure patient, long-term capital.31

• Regulatory Complexity: Health-tech innovators must navigate a fragmented, often ambiguous, and slow-moving regulatory landscape.27 Many countries lack clear, dedicated frameworks for digital health, creating uncertainty around licensing, data privacy, and interoperability standards that can stifle innovation and make cross-border expansion difficult.28

3.4. The Investment Ecosystem

The funding landscape for African health-tech is evolving. While historically underfunded compared to other sectors like fintech, it is gaining traction.23 The ecosystem includes a mix of actors:

• Venture Capital (VC): A growing number of local and international VC firms are focusing on African health-tech, though they tend to concentrate investments in more developed hubs like Nigeria, Kenya, South Africa, and Egypt.31

• Impact Investors: Given the dual potential for financial return and social impact, health-tech is a prime target for impact investors and development finance institutions who may offer more patient capital than traditional VCs.9

• Incubators and Accelerators: Organizations like Villgro Africa, based in Nairobi, play a crucial role by providing early-stage seed funding, mentorship, and business development support to help startups navigate the "valley of death" and become investment-ready.34
  
  There is a growing consensus that the donor-dependent models of the past are unsustainable. The most successful and attractive startups are those building commercially viable businesses that can scale without indefinite grant funding, a shift that is reshaping the investment criteria across the continent.23

Table 2: The Health-Tech Startup Ecosystem in Sub-Saharan Africa: Key Challenges and Technological Opportunities

4. The Catalytic Nexus: How CBPR De-Risks and Informs Health Enterprise Development

The principles of Community-Based Participatory Research, while originating in public health and social sciences, offer a powerful and highly relevant framework for addressing the most common and critical failure points in the startup lifecycle. When viewed through an entrepreneurial lens, CBPR is not an academic exercise but a strategic methodology for de-risking a new venture by ensuring it is deeply embedded in the community it aims to serve from its very inception. This process transforms the traditional "product-market fit" paradigm into a more robust and sustainable "solution-community-context fit."

4.1. From Community Need to Market Demand

The most common reason for startup failure, globally and in Africa, is the creation of a product or service for which there is no significant market need.9 Entrepreneurs often build solutions based on perceived problems rather than validated ones. CBPR directly mitigates this fundamental risk. Its core principle is that research must begin with a topic of importance

to the community.14 The process of collaborative problem identification—involving community members, local leaders, and healthcare workers in dialogue to define and prioritize their most pressing health challenges—is the most authentic and effective form of initial market research.4 It ensures that the resulting venture is not just offering a "nice-to-have" but is addressing a genuine, deeply felt pain point. This moves beyond extractive surveys and focus groups to a shared understanding of the problem in its full context, generating a level of insight that traditional market research can rarely achieve.

4.2. Building Trust as a Core Business Asset

In many Sub-Saharan African communities, there exists a well-founded history of mistrust toward external entities, including researchers, government programs, and private companies, often stemming from past experiences of exploitation or failed interventions.37 A new startup, particularly one introducing novel technology, enters this environment as an unknown and potentially untrusted actor. CBPR provides a direct and powerful antidote to this challenge. Its emphasis on long-term commitment, equitable partnerships, transparency in decision-making, and co-learning processes is explicitly designed to build deep, authentic, and lasting trust.21 This trust, cultivated over time, is not a soft metric; it is a hard business asset. It translates directly into a pre-built user base of early adopters, higher rates of engagement and retention, and a network of community champions who become the venture's most credible and effective marketing force. A startup born from a CBPR partnership does not have to "acquire" its first customers; it is created in service to them, with their buy-in established from day one.

4.3. Co-Creation as a Form of Participatory Design

A solution that addresses a real need can still fail if it is not usable, accessible, or culturally appropriate. This is a design failure. The CBPR process is, in essence, a form of applied Participatory Design (PD), a methodology that actively involves end-users throughout the design and development process.41 By involving community partners in all phases of the research—from defining the problem to designing the intervention and interpreting the results—CBPR ensures that the final solution is tailored to the specific context of its users.18 Community members provide critical feedback on everything from the user interface of a mobile app to the operational model of a clinic, ensuring the solution aligns with local norms, literacy levels, and daily realities.43 This iterative, co-creative process leads to products and services with superior usability and user experience, which in turn drives higher satisfaction, engagement, and ultimately, better health outcomes.41

4.4. Cultivating a Multidisciplinary and Localized Team

A strong, diverse, and mission-driven team is a critical predictor of startup success.9 CBPR provides a natural and effective mechanism for identifying and cultivating this talent at the local level. The collaborative process brings together a wide range of stakeholders: community members with invaluable lived experience, respected local leaders who can navigate community dynamics, frontline health workers with practical operational knowledge, and academic researchers with technical expertise.19 This dynamic environment serves as an incubator, building capacity among all partners and identifying individuals within the community who demonstrate leadership, passion, and entrepreneurial potential.4 A startup that emerges from such a partnership is born with a team that possesses an unparalleled, multi-faceted understanding of the problem and the context, addressing the challenge of hiring top, locally-grounded talent from its inception. This deep community rooting also provides a strategic advantage in a funding environment where investors are increasingly recognizing the importance of local market realities.9

5. A Framework for Translation: The Community-Driven Venture Pathway

5.1. Limitations of Existing Translational Models

While established frameworks for translating research into practice exist, they often fall short of guiding the specific journey from community-based research to a sustainable enterprise. Models like the Knowledge to Action (KTA) framework provide excellent structures for moving evidence into clinical or public health practice but are not explicitly designed to incorporate the principles of business model development, market validation, and venture financing.2 Similarly, community health improvement processes are strong on community leadership and needs assessment but typically lack a pathway toward creating a self-sustaining, scalable entity.46 What is needed is an integrated framework that purposefully bridges the worlds of community-engaged research and social entrepreneurship.

5.2. Introducing the "Community-Driven Venture Pathway"

To address this gap, this paper proposes a novel conceptual framework: the Community-Driven Venture Pathway. This multi-phase model provides a structured yet flexible roadmap for researchers, community partners, entrepreneurs, and funders to collaboratively navigate the complex process of transforming a community-identified health need into a viable and impactful health startup. The pathway integrates the core principles of CBPR, Participatory Design, and lean startup methodology.

• Phase 1: Co-Discovery (Grounded in CBPR): This foundational phase is dedicated to building the partnership and achieving a deep, shared understanding of the health challenge within its local context. It is about establishing the fundamental "why" behind the potential venture. Key activities include forming an equitable partnership with clear roles and governance (e.g., via a Memorandum of Understanding), conducting extensive trust-building activities, collaboratively mapping community strengths and assets (not just needs), and using participatory methods to define and prioritize a specific health problem.48 The primary outcome is a validated community health priority, backed by a strong, trusting partnership.

• Phase 2: Co-Design (Grounded in Participatory Design): With the problem clearly defined, this phase shifts to the collaborative creation of a potential solution. It defines the "what" and "how" of the intervention. This phase is characterized by iterative cycles of ideation, prototyping, and feedback. Key activities include co-design workshops, creating low-fidelity prototypes (e.g., sketches, mock-ups), and continuous testing with end-users to refine the solution's features, usability, and cultural appropriateness.41 The outcome is a user-validated prototype or service model that is both desirable to the community and feasible to implement.

• Phase 3: Incubation & Validation: This phase bridges the gap between a promising solution and a sustainable business model. The focus shifts to testing the venture's viability in the real world. Key activities include developing a clear value proposition, identifying potential customer segments and revenue streams (even if subsidized), conducting a pilot study to test both the health efficacy and the operational model, and seeking initial seed funding, often from grants, innovation challenges, or impact investors.52 The target outcome is a validated business model with evidence of both health impact and market potential.

• Phase 4: Enterprise Launch & Scale: This final phase involves the formalization of the pilot project into a legally incorporated startup and the development of a strategy for growth and broader impact. Key activities include recruiting a formal management and operational team (often drawing from the original partnership), securing growth-stage funding (e.g., from venture capital or larger impact funds), navigating complex regulatory and licensing pathways, and developing an explicit strategy for scaling—which may involve replicating the model in new communities or scaling the underlying technology platform.55 The outcome is a fully operational social enterprise on a trajectory for sustainable growth.

5.3. Cross-Cutting Principles of the Framework

Underpinning all four phases are several critical, cross-cutting principles. Continuous Community Feedback ensures the venture remains aligned with and accountable to its founding community. Mutual Capacity Building ensures that all partners—community members, researchers, and entrepreneurs—are continuously learning and growing throughout the process. Finally, a commitment to Shared Benefit and Ownership explores models (e.g., community advisory boards with real power, profit-sharing mechanisms, or local employment) that ensure the community continues to benefit from the venture's success, maintaining the ethical foundation established in Phase 1.

Table 3: The Community-Driven Venture Pathway: A Phased Framework for Translating CBPR into Health Startups

6. Illuminating the Path: Case Studies of Community-Centric Health Innovation in Africa

The theoretical link between community-based research and successful enterprise can be vividly illustrated by examining real-world examples from across Sub-Saharan Africa. These cases, spanning both formal research projects and established social enterprises, demonstrate how the principles of deep community engagement are not an abstract ideal but a practical foundation for impactful innovation.

6.1. Formal CBPR Projects as Innovation Seeds

These projects exemplify the early "Co-Discovery" and "Co-Design" phases of the Community-Driven Venture Pathway, showing how the research process itself can generate the blueprint for a highly targeted and relevant health solution.

• Case Study: HIV Care for Mobile Populations in Western Kenya: In a study aimed at improving HIV care for highly mobile populations—a group often lost to follow-up—researchers used a CBPR approach to engage stakeholders in rural Kenya and Uganda.58 Instead of imposing a pre-designed solution, the project held iterative, gender-balanced community meetings to understand the specific challenges mobile individuals face, such as poor referral systems and stigma. Through this collaborative process, the community itself prioritized and designed potential solutions. They identified the most desirable interventions: mobile health "cards" with electronic records to ensure continuity of care across different clinics, and peer-delivered, home-based services located at key transit hubs and trading centers.58 This case perfectly illustrates how CBPR can produce a detailed, user-validated service design that is far more likely to succeed than a generic, externally conceived program.

• Case Study: Reframing Cervical Health in South Africa: A research project in Cape Town initially intended to focus on increasing screening for cervical cancer.5 However, extensive consultations and focus groups with community members, health workers, and local leaders revealed that "cervical cancer" was not a primary concern in a community grappling with more immediate issues. The CBPR process allowed the community to reshape the research agenda. They helped refocus the project from a narrow disease-specific lens to a holistic concept of "cervical health," which acknowledged the intersecting impacts of HIV/AIDS, sexually transmitted diseases, sexual violence, and poverty on women's bodies and lives.5 This profound shift, driven by community wisdom, demonstrates CBPR's power to ensure that a health intervention addresses the problem as it is actually
  experienced, thereby creating the foundation for a solution that is deeply relevant and resonant.

• Case Study: The SCRATCHMAPS Project in the Western Cape: This project, aimed at mobilizing men for peace and safety, provides a structural model for implementing CBPR.59 It established formal community engagement structures, including a multi-stakeholder advisory committee and a research team composed of local community members. The project explicitly confronted the power dynamics inherent in research by making its budget transparent and openly negotiating the research design with community partners.59 This case highlights the essential, behind-the-scenes work of building the institutional and relational architecture necessary for a true and effective community-academic partnership.

6.2. Successful Social Enterprises Analyzed Through a CBPR Lens

While not all successful startups explicitly use the term "CBPR," an analysis of their business models reveals a deep alignment with its core principles. Their success can be reverse-engineered to show how an intuitive, profound understanding of community needs, assets, and trust dynamics functions as a competitive advantage.

• Case Study: mPharma (Ghana, Nigeria, and across Africa): mPharma has become a leading health-tech company by building a platform that makes medicines more affordable and accessible.8 Its technological innovation is significant, but the strategic genius of its model lies in its deep integration with existing community assets: small, independent, family-run pharmacies. Instead of trying to replace these trusted local institutions, mPharma partners with them, providing inventory management tools, financing, and bulk purchasing power. This approach directly embodies the CBPR principles of "building on community strengths" and working through established, trusted networks. Its success is built not on disrupting the community fabric, but on strengthening it.

• Case Study: Unjani Clinics (South Africa): The Unjani Clinics network addresses a critical gap in the South African healthcare system by providing affordable primary care to the "employed but uninsured" population.60 Its innovative social franchise model is a powerful example of CBPR in action. The model identifies a key community asset—professional nurses—and empowers them to become entrepreneurs, owning and operating their own clinics in their own communities. This approach simultaneously addresses the human capital shortage, creates local economic opportunity, and delivers care through trusted individuals who are part of the community they serve. The entire model is predicated on a deep, participatory understanding of both the needs of a specific patient population and the aspirations of a specific professional cadre.

• Case Study: Zipline (Rwanda and Ghana): On the surface, Zipline appears to be a technology-first company. However, its successful implementation was impossible without deep collaboration that mirrors CBPR's partnership principle.8 Zipline's service is not sold directly to consumers but is integrated into the national health system in close partnership with governments and ministries of health. It solves a problem—the critical delay in receiving life-saving medical supplies—that is acutely felt at the most remote community health posts. Its success required building trust and co-designing logistics with national and local health authorities, ensuring the technology served the existing system rather than imposing a new one. This alignment with system-level and community-level needs is a hallmark of a participatory approach.

7. Cultivating Fertile Ground: The Role of the Supporting Ecosystem

The translation of a community-grounded research insight into a scalable health enterprise is not a spontaneous event. It requires a nurturing and interconnected ecosystem of institutions that can provide the necessary resources, expertise, and pathways to market. A successful health innovation ecosystem is not a linear pipeline but a collaborative network where universities, innovation hubs, and capital providers perform distinct yet interdependent functions. A brilliant CBPR project will fail to become a startup without an effective technology transfer office or an accelerator; an accelerator will have no pipeline of impactful ventures without strong community-based research. This symbiotic relationship must be intentionally cultivated.

7.1. Universities as Engines of Innovation

African universities are increasingly evolving from traditional centers of teaching and research into dynamic engines of innovation and entrepreneurship. Their role is multifaceted and critical to the early stages of the Community-Driven Venture Pathway.

• From Research to IP Commercialization: Universities are the primary source of the rigorous research that can underpin new health innovations. Increasingly, they are developing the capacity to translate this research into commercial assets through Technology Transfer Offices (TTOs). The University of Cape Town's (UCT) Research Contracts and Innovation (RC&I) office, for example, has successfully spun off over 20 companies since 2004, including health-focused ventures like Strait Access Technologies (developing heart valves) and Cape Bio Pharms (producing proteins for diagnostics and vaccines).61 This function is vital for protecting intellectual property and creating the legal entities that can attract investment.

• Fostering Entrepreneurial Mindsets: Beyond commercializing faculty research, universities play a key role in cultivating the next generation of innovators. This is achieved by embedding entrepreneurship and design thinking into health sciences curricula and by creating extracurricular programs that provide students with hands-on experience.61 Initiatives like the Africa Health Collaborative (AHC), a partnership between the University of Toronto, eight leading African universities, and the Mastercard Foundation, directly support this through its Health Entrepreneurship Challenge. This program provides aspiring student founders with training, mentorship, and seed funding to develop their health ventures.63

• University-led Hubs for Social Innovation: Some universities are establishing dedicated hubs to act as catalysts for social innovation, explicitly aiming to bridge the gap between academic research and community needs. These hubs serve as cross-disciplinary platforms that connect researchers with community organizations, government bodies, and social innovators, creating a fertile environment for collaborative problem-solving and the co-creation of solutions.64

7.2. Innovation Hubs and Accelerators

While universities can birth an innovation, specialized innovation hubs and accelerators are often required to nurture it into a viable business. These organizations provide the critical "greenhouse" environment for early-stage startups, offering services that academics and community groups typically lack. Their role includes providing business model development support, mentorship from experienced entrepreneurs, access to technical resources, and connections to potential partners and investors. Pan-African organizations like the African Health Innovation Centre (AHIC) in Ghana and the HealthTech Hub Africa in Rwanda are pivotal players.65 They run incubation and acceleration programs that fast-track startups, preparing them for investment and helping them navigate the complexities of scaling within public health systems.67

7.3. The Role of Capital: Impact Investors and Diaspora Networks

Securing appropriate financing is a major hurdle for health startups in Africa. The nature of ventures emerging from a CBPR process—with their deep social mission and often longer path to profitability—makes them particularly well-suited for specific types of capital that prioritize more than just financial returns.

• Impact Investing: Impact investors represent a crucial source of "patient capital" for community-driven health enterprises. These investors intentionally seek to generate positive, measurable social and environmental impact alongside a financial return.68 They are more likely to appreciate the deep community trust and validated social need that a CBPR-birthed venture brings to the table. Their investment criteria align well with the long-term, sustainable vision of these startups, and they often provide valuable strategic support in addition to funding.70

• Diaspora Engagement: The African diaspora is an increasingly important source of both capital and expertise. Networks like the African Diaspora Network (ADN) work to connect Africans in the diaspora with entrepreneurs and innovators on the continent, facilitating direct investment and collaboration.72 Diaspora investors often bring a unique combination of financial resources, international business experience, and a deep, personal commitment to the continent's development, making them powerful allies for local startups.

8. Policy and Regulatory Imperatives for a Thriving Ecosystem

8.1. The Current Regulatory Landscape: A Barrier to Innovation

For the community-driven innovation ecosystem to flourish, it requires a supportive and enabling policy and regulatory environment. Currently, this is one of the most significant barriers facing health-tech startups across Africa. The landscape is often characterized by a lack of unified, comprehensive, and updated policies governing digital health at both national and regional levels.28 Entrepreneurs face complex, lengthy, and unclear licensing processes, which can drain precious time and capital.76 Furthermore, inadequate legal frameworks for data protection and security create risks for both patients and companies, while the slow pace of regulatory bodies in adapting to new technologies can stifle the very innovation needed to solve pressing health challenges.28

8.2. Case Studies in Regulatory Reform

Despite these challenges, positive momentum is building as several countries and regions begin to develop more sophisticated regulatory frameworks tailored to the digital age.

• East Africa (Kenya): Kenya has taken a significant step forward with the enactment of its Digital Health Act in 2023.73 This legislation aims to create a predictable and secure landscape for digital health by establishing a Digital Health Agency and providing clear guidelines on data governance, interoperability, privacy, and security. By treating health data as a strategic national asset and mandating compliance with its Data Protection Act, Kenya is setting a benchmark for the region in creating an environment where digital health innovation can thrive responsibly.

• West Africa (Nigeria & Ghana): Nigeria, the region's largest economy, is leveraging its National Health Act and Nigeria Data Protection Regulation to create a structured framework for health data.79 The government's Nigeria Digital in Health Initiative (NDHI) is actively working to integrate digital tools into the mainstream healthcare system. Ghana has also advanced its regulatory environment by launching a nationwide e-pharmacy platform, providing digital oversight for pharmacies across the country.79

• Southern Africa (South Africa): South Africa has one of the most developed regulatory systems on the continent, overseen by the South African Health Products Regulatory Authority (SAHPRA).80 SAHPRA provides a robust, risk-based framework for the approval of medical devices and in-vitro diagnostics, which is increasingly aligning with international standards. This clarity, while sometimes rigorous, provides a predictable pathway to market for innovators in the medical device space.80

8.3. Pan-African and Regional Harmonization Efforts

Given that many health challenges and market opportunities transcend national borders, regional and pan-African regulatory harmonization is critical for enabling startups to scale. Organizations like the African Medicines Agency (AMA) and the Africa Centres for Disease Control and Prevention (Africa CDC) are playing a pivotal role in this process.82 The AMA aims to harmonize medical product regulations across the continent, which will simplify the approval process for new drugs and devices.83 The Africa CDC, through initiatives like the Africa HealthTech Marketplace, is creating platforms to showcase trusted, locally developed digital solutions and connect innovators with policymakers.84 Collaborative platforms like the HealthTech Hub Africa's Policy Program are also essential, as they facilitate dialogue between startups and policymakers to co-create more effective and innovation-friendly policies.76

8.4. Actionable Policy Recommendations

To accelerate the growth of a vibrant, community-driven health innovation ecosystem, stakeholders must take coordinated and strategic action. The following table outlines key recommendations for governments, regional bodies, universities, and investors.

Table 4: Policy Recommendations for Stakeholders in the African Health Innovation Ecosystem

9. Conclusion: A Call for an Integrated, Community-First Approach to Health Innovation in Africa

9.1. Synthesizing the Argument

The journey to achieving health equity in Sub-Saharan Africa is paved with challenges that require more than just capital or technology; they demand a fundamental shift in the philosophy of innovation. This paper has argued that Community-Based Participatory Research provides the ethical and strategic foundation for this shift. By placing community wisdom, needs, and assets at the very beginning of the innovation lifecycle, CBPR systematically de-risks the creation of new health ventures. It addresses the primary causes of failure by ensuring solutions are not only wanted but are also trusted, usable, and contextually appropriate. Integrating CBPR into the process of venture creation is, therefore, not a peripheral "social impact" activity but a core strategic imperative for achieving commercial viability and long-term sustainability in the complex and diverse markets of Africa.

9.2. Addressing the Challenge of Scale

A critical question remains: how can hyper-local solutions, born from the unique context of a single community, be scaled to address continental challenges? This presents a paradox, as the very context-specificity that makes a CBPR-derived solution effective can also limit its direct replicability.55 The solution lies in reframing the concept of "scale." Instead of aiming to scale a single, fixed product, the goal should be to scale the

process of community-driven innovation itself.6 This means empowering more communities with the tools, resources, and partnerships to co-design their own contextually appropriate solutions. Technology can play a crucial role here, not as a rigid product, but as a flexible, adaptable platform that different communities can tailor to their own needs. Scaling, in this paradigm, is about fostering resilient, self-determining local health ecosystems, connected and supported by enabling policies and shared technological infrastructure.89

9.3. A Vision for the Future

The convergence of community-led research and local entrepreneurship offers a powerful vision for the future of health in Africa. It is a future where the continent moves from being a recipient of external aid and imported solutions to a global leader in a new paradigm of equitable and sustainable innovation. This approach fosters true health sovereignty—the capacity for African nations and communities to set their own health priorities and to develop, own, and scale their own solutions.6 By building from the ground up, leveraging the immense talent and resilience within its communities, and fostering an ecosystem that supports this vision, Sub-Saharan Africa can not only solve its own health challenges but can also provide a model for the rest of the world on how to build health systems that are truly for the people, by the people. The path forward requires bold action, sincere collaboration, and wise investment, but it is a path that can redefine not only the future of health in Africa, but the very meaning of global health innovation.

Works cited

1. Community-Based Participatory Research as a Catalyst for Health Startups - Magazine, accessed September 21, 2025, https://magazine.doctorsexplain.net/community-based-participatory-research-as-a-catalyst-for-health-startups

2. Implementation • EDCTP Knowledge Hub, accessed September 21, 2025, https://edctpknowledgehub.tghn.org/translating-research-policy/implementation/

3. Narrative review of frameworks for translating research evidence ..., accessed September 21, 2025, https://www.phrp.com.au/issues/february-2017-volume-27-issue-1-2/narrative-review-of-frameworks-for-translating-research-evidence-into-policy-and-practice/

4. (PDF) Harnessing the Power of the Grassroots to Conduct Public ..., accessed September 21, 2025, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/235389837_Harnessing_the_Power_of_the_Grassroots_to_Conduct_Public_Health_Research_in_Sub-Saharan_Africa_A_Case_Study_from_Western_Kenya_in_the_Adaptation_of_Community-Based_Participatory_Research_CBPR_Approach

5. Community-based participatory research (CBPR) in South Africa: Engaging multiple constituents to shape the research question | Request PDF - ResearchGate, accessed September 21, 2025, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/7786451_Community-based_participatory_research_CBPR_in_South_Africa_Engaging_multiple_constituents_to_shape_the_research_question

6. Doing More with Less: Reimagining Health in Africa Amid Global Funding Cuts, accessed September 21, 2025, https://africarenewal.un.org/en/magazine/doing-more-less-reimagining-health-africa-amid-global-funding-cuts

7. Health care in Africa: Emerging technologies at play | Brookings, accessed September 21, 2025, https://www.brookings.edu/articles/health-care-in-africa-emerging-technologies-at-play/

8. Bridging the Gap: How African Startups Are Fighting Medication ..., accessed September 21, 2025, https://aaeafrica.org/ghana/bridging-the-gap-how-african-startups-are-fighting-medication-scarcity-by-transforming-healthcare-access/

9. Scaling health innovation in emerging markets: What does it really take? - Impact Alpha, accessed September 21, 2025, https://impactalpha.com/scaling-health-innovation-in-emerging-markets-what-does-it-really-take/

10. A WORKING DEFINITION OF HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH - NCBI, accessed September 21, 2025, https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK231502/

11. Clinical & Health Services Research | NIMHD, accessed September 21, 2025, https://www.nimhd.nih.gov/research/extramural-research/clinical-health-services-research

12. Understanding Clinical Research | Duke Health, accessed September 21, 2025, https://www.dukehealth.org/clinical-trials/understanding-clinical-research

13. llu.edu, accessed September 21, 2025, https://llu.edu/academics/centers-institutes/institute-community-partnerships-icp/our-work/community-engaged-research/community-based-participatory-research#:~:text=The%20Kellogg%20Health%20Scholars%20Program,unique%20strengths%20that%20each%20brings.

14. Community Based Participatory Research - ICP | Loma Linda University, accessed September 21, 2025, https://llu.edu/academics/centers-institutes/institute-community-partnerships-icp/our-work/community-engaged-research/community-based-participatory-research

15. Community-Based Participatory Research (CBPR) - Council on ..., accessed September 21, 2025, https://www.cswe.org/CSWE/media/Diversity-Center/3-Module-3_Community-Based-Participatory-Research.pdf

16. Community-Based Participatory Research Contributions to Intervention Research: The Intersection of Science and Practice to Improve Health Equity - National Institutes of Health (NIH) |, accessed September 21, 2025, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2837458/

17. Community-Based Participatory Research From the Margin to the Mainstream | Circulation, accessed September 21, 2025, https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/10.1161/circulationaha.107.729863

18. Community-Based Participatory Research Principles - Detroit Urban Research Center, accessed September 21, 2025, https://www.detroiturc.org/about-cbpr/community-based-participatory-research-principles

19. Chapter 24 COMMUNITY-BASED PARTICIPATORY RESEARCH ..., accessed September 21, 2025, https://medcoeckapwstorprd01.blob.core.usgovcloudapi.net/pfw-images/dbimages/Airborne%20Chapter%2024%20-%20Mark%202%20green.pdf

20. Community-Based Participatory Research (CBPR) - LA CaTS, accessed September 21, 2025, https://www.lacats.org/documents/About%20CBPR%2010-08-13.pdf

21. Fostering Health Equity through Community-Based Participatory ..., accessed September 21, 2025, https://sph.umich.edu/pursuit/2019posts/fostering_health_equity.html

22. Community-Based Participatory Research | Stroke - American Heart Association Journals, accessed September 21, 2025, https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/10.1161/STROKEAHA.118.024241

23. Medtech and Healthtech in Africa: Opportunities and Investment, accessed September 21, 2025, https://www.lsiusasummit.com/news/medtech-and-healthtech-in-africa-opportunities-and-investment

24. HealthTech Africa emerges in 2025 driven by significant investments and innovation, accessed September 21, 2025, https://www.healthcare.digital/single-post/healthtech-africa-emerges-in-2025-driven-by-significant-investments-and-innovation

25. Bridging Innovation and Impact in Africa's Health Sector - German Accelerator, accessed September 21, 2025, https://hubspot.germanaccelerator.com/en/kickstartfocus-healthtech-africa

26. The-Development-of-Emerging-Health-Technologies-in-Africa.pdf, accessed September 21, 2025, https://healthtechafrica.org/sites/default/files/resources/The-Development-of-Emerging-Health-Technologies-in-Africa.pdf

27. Breaking Barriers: How African Healthtech Startups Are Overcoming Challenges to Improve Healthcare, accessed September 21, 2025, https://thehealthtech.org/breaking-barriers-how-african-healthtech-startups-are-overcoming-challenges-to-improve-healthcare/

28. Full article: Technical and regulatory challenges of digital health ..., accessed September 21, 2025, https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/13696998.2023.2249757

29. Identifying Key Challenges Facing Healthcare Systems In Africa And Potential Solutions, accessed September 21, 2025, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6844097/

30. What is coming next in health technology startups? Some insights ..., accessed September 21, 2025, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10668566/

31. Venture Capital and the Rise of Africa's Tech Startups, accessed September 21, 2025, https://www.ifc.org/en/insights-reports/2025/venture-capital-and-the-rise-of-africa-s-tech-startups

32. Revolutionizing Healthcare: The Rise of Healthtech Startups in Africa - Upper Nile Institute, accessed September 21, 2025, https://uppernileinstitute.com/revolutionizing-healthcare-the-rise-of-healthtech-startups-in-africa/

33. Africa's Medtech Revolution. Navigating Challenges: The Resilience ..., accessed September 21, 2025, https://tomidee.medium.com/africas-medtech-revolution-11f3dfc4bc49

34. Villgro Africa: helping health startups take their ideas to market - WIPO, accessed September 21, 2025, https://www.wipo.int/web/wipo-magazine/articles/villgro-africa-helping-health-startups-take-their-ideas-to-market-42637

35. 5 Key Factors To Consider When Building A Healthtech Startup - MedTech Pioneers, accessed September 21, 2025, https://medtechpioneers.org/5-key-factors-to-consider-when-building-a-healthtech-startup/

36. Community engagement in research in sub-Saharan Africa: current practices, barriers, facilitators, ethical considerations and the role of gender - a systematic review - Pan African Medical Journal, accessed September 21, 2025, https://www.panafrican-med-journal.com/content/article/43/152/full/

37. Community-Based Participatory Research (CBPR) 101 - Feinberg School of Medicine, accessed September 21, 2025, https://www.feinberg.northwestern.edu/sites/cch/docs/arcc-resources-directory/26-cbpr-101-2014expanded.pdf

38. From Insight to Action: Applying Community-Based Participatory ..., accessed September 21, 2025, https://www.cdc.gov/pcd/issues/2025/24_0400.htm

39. (PDF) Community-Based Participatory Research: Engaging Locals in Health Solutions, accessed September 21, 2025, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/390387858_Community-Based_Participatory_Research_Engaging_Locals_in_Health_Solutions

40. From Insight to Action: Applying Community-Based Participatory Research to Improve Population Health Among Black Women, accessed September 21, 2025, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12124221/

41. What is participatory design? | IxDF, accessed September 21, 2025, https://www.interaction-design.org/literature/topics/participatory-design

42. Integrating and producing evidence through participatory design - Taylor & Francis Online, accessed September 21, 2025, https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/15710882.2022.2096906

43. Key Components of Participatory Design Workshops for Digital Health Solutions: Nominal Group Technique and Feasibility Study, accessed September 21, 2025, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12290142/

44. A Practical Guide to Participatory Design Sessions for the Development of Information Visualizations: Tutorial, accessed September 21, 2025, https://jopm.jmir.org/2024/1/e64508

45. What is Community-Engaged Research?, accessed September 21, 2025, https://healthycommunities.ucr.edu/what-community-engaged-research

46. A Model to Translate Evidence-Based Interventions Into Community Practice | Request PDF - ResearchGate, accessed September 21, 2025, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/221684063_A_Model_to_Translate_Evidence-Based_Interventions_Into_Community_Practice

47. A Model to Translate Evidence-Based Interventions Into Community Practice - PMC, accessed September 21, 2025, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3489378/

48. The Community-Engaged Research Framework | NORC at the University of Chicago, accessed September 21, 2025, https://www.norc.org/research/library/community-engaged-research-framework.html

49. Ideal Collaboration: A Conceptual Framework of Community Collaboration - ResearchGate, accessed September 21, 2025, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/307812447_Ideal_Collaboration_A_Conceptual_Framework_of_Community_Collaboration

50. Literature Review: Developing a Conceptual Framework to Assess the Sustainability of Community Coalitions Post-Federal Funding - https: // aspe . hhs . gov., accessed September 21, 2025, https://aspe.hhs.gov/reports/literature-review-developing-conceptual-framework-assess-sustainability-community-coalitions-post

51. Community-Based Participatory Research Conceptual Model: Community Partner Consultation and Face Validity - PMC - National Institutes of Health (NIH) |, accessed September 21, 2025, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4839192/

52. Using Community-Based Participatory Research(CBPR) for Health Promotion, accessed September 21, 2025, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/264101176_Using_Community-Based_Participatory_ResearchCBPR_for_Health_Promotion

53. The Three R's: How Community Based Participatory Research ..., accessed September 21, 2025, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3832061/

54. CBPR/Evidence for Engagement - UNM Health Sciences Center, accessed September 21, 2025, https://hsc.unm.edu/population-health/research-centers/center-participatory-research/cbpr-community-engagement/

55. Challenges and Facilitating Factors in Sustaining Community-Based Participatory Research Partnerships: Lessons Learned from the Detroit, New York City and Seattle Urban Research Centers - PMC, accessed September 21, 2025, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3261295/

56. Transferring a Community-Based Participatory Research Project to Promote Physical Activity Among Socially Disadvantaged Women—Experiences From 15 Years of BIG - Frontiers, accessed September 21, 2025, https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/public-health/articles/10.3389/fpubh.2020.571413/full

57. The Long-Term Public Health Impact of a Community-Based Participatory Research Project for Health Promotion Among Socially Disadvantaged Women—A Case Study Protocol - Frontiers, accessed September 21, 2025, https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/public-health/articles/10.3389/fpubh.2021.628630/full

58. Nothing about us without us: Community-based participatory ..., accessed September 21, 2025, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10184576/

59. (PDF) Community-based participatory research: An illustrative case ..., accessed September 21, 2025, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/236985787_Community-based_participatory_research_An_illustrative_case_study_of_community_engagement_in_one_low-income_community_in_the_Western_Cape

60. Innovative Healthcare Solutions in South Africa: Leveraging Private ..., accessed September 21, 2025, https://reachalliance.org/case-study/social-franchising-as-a-model-to-improve-access-to-health-care-in-south-africa/

61. Fostering technology innovation in Africa | UCT News, accessed September 21, 2025, https://www.news.uct.ac.za/news/research-office/-article/2018-07-23-fostering-technology-innovation-in-africa

62. UCT Spin-off Company Portfolio | University of Cape Town, accessed September 21, 2025, https://uct.ac.za/rci/invest-uct-spin-offs

63. African-led startups showcase health-care innovations, accessed September 21, 2025, https://defygravitycampaign.utoronto.ca/news-and-stories/african-led-startups-showcase-health-care-innovations/

64. Universities as catalysts of social innovation in health systems in low ..., accessed September 21, 2025, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7353699/

65. What we do - African Health Innovation Centre | AHIC, accessed September 21, 2025, https://africanhealthinnovation.org/home/what-we-do/

66. Home - African Health Innovation Centre | AHIC, accessed September 21, 2025, https://africanhealthinnovation.org/

67. Driving HealthTech to innovate population health and care delivery ..., accessed September 21, 2025, https://www.novartisfoundation.org/transforming-population-health/healthtech-innovation

68. IMPACT INVESTING IN AFRICA, accessed September 21, 2025, https://www.shareweb.ch/site/Multilateral-Institutions/Documents/Impact%20Investment%20Final%20Report.pdf

69. Impact investing | Department of Economic and Social Affairs, accessed September 21, 2025, https://sdgs.un.org/partnerships/impact-investing

70. Key Takeaways from the 2024 Africa HealthTech Summit - Global Innovation Fund, accessed September 21, 2025, https://www.globalinnovation.fund/news/climate-resilience/key-takeaways-from-the-2024-africa-healthtech-summit

71. Advancing impact investing in healthcare for those who need it most - Philips Foundation, accessed September 21, 2025, https://www.philips-foundation.com/a-w/articles/eddine-advancing-impact-investing-in-healthcare.html

72. Our Team - African Diaspora Network, accessed September 21, 2025, https://africandiasporanetwork.org/our-team/

73. REGULATIONS FOR DIGITAL HEALTH, AND WHY THEY ARE ..., accessed September 21, 2025, https://transformhealthcoalition.org/regulations-for-digital-health-and-why-they-are-pivotal-in-healthcare-provision-in-kenya/

74. Framework for Development and Implementation of Digital Health ..., accessed September 21, 2025, https://d-nb.info/1227865325/34

75. Regulatory Standards and Guidance for the Use of Health Apps for ..., accessed September 21, 2025, https://www.jmir.org/2024/1/e49163/PDF

76. The Policy Program - HealthTech Hub Africa, accessed September 21, 2025, https://thehealthtech.org/the-policy-program/

77. Regulatory challenges of digital health: the case of mental health applications and personal data in South Africa - PMC, accessed September 21, 2025, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12074941/

78. Does Kenya's Digital Health Act Mark A New Era for Data ... - CIPESA, accessed September 21, 2025, https://cipesa.org/2024/05/does-kenyas-digital-health-act-mark-a-new-era-for-data-governance-and-regulation/

79. Industry insights - World Health Expo, accessed September 21, 2025, https://www.worldhealthexpo.com/events/healthcare/lagos/en/overview/industry-insights/Innovative-Healthcare-Technologies.html

80. Navigating the regulatory landscape of South Africa - congenius.ch, accessed September 21, 2025, https://congenius.ch/regulatory-landscape-south-africa/

81. Digital health apps and telemedicine in South Africa - CMS Law Firm, accessed September 21, 2025, https://cms.law/en/int/expert-guides/cms-expert-guide-to-digital-health-apps-and-telemedicine/south-africa

82. Clinical trials are key to improving medicines access in Africa - The World Economic Forum, accessed September 21, 2025, https://www.weforum.org/stories/2025/07/healthcare-access-africa-clinical-trials/

83. A new era for Africa's leadership: driving health sovereignty, financing, and equity - PMNCH, accessed September 21, 2025, https://pmnch.who.int/news-and-events/news/item/18-09-2025-a-new-era-for-africa-s-leadership-driving-health-sovereignty-financing-and-equity

84. A New Digital Health Platform for Africa - Africa CDC, accessed September 21, 2025, https://africacdc.org/news-item/a-new-digital-health-platform-for-africa/

85. Policy and Regulatory Frameworks | Health Tech Africa, accessed September 21, 2025, https://healthtechafrica.org/about-us/objectives/policy-and-regulatory-frameworks

86. Strategies for effective health care for Africa in the Fourth Industrial Revolution | Brookings, accessed September 21, 2025, https://www.brookings.edu/articles/strategies-for-effective-health-care-for-africa-in-the-fourth-industrial-revolution/

87. Strategies for effective health care for Africa in the Fourth Industrial Revolution - Brookings Institution, accessed September 21, 2025, https://www.brookings.edu/wp-content/uploads/2021/10/Strategies-for-effective-health-care-delivery-in-Africa_FINAL.pdf

88. REACH initiative | IFRC, accessed September 21, 2025, https://www.ifrc.org/our-work/health-and-care/community-health/reach-initiative

89. Africa rallies new financing models to shield communities from climate-driven health crises, accessed September 21, 2025, https://reliefweb.int/report/world/africa-rallies-new-financing-models-shield-communities-climate-driven-health-crises